FAQ
Which digital personal data does the consortium process?
Who are controller and processors in the project?
Can the consortium instruct Amazon Web Services (AWS) to store personal data on its behalf, taking into account Schrems cases?
On which lawful basis are the processing activities carried out in the project? And after the project if digital biomarkers could be used in medical practice?
What are the obligations of the consortium when the PD patients exercise their rights?
Is there a duty to keep the data collected during the project after the end of this project? Which data must be kept?
What information must ICM and UL (on behalf of the consortium) provide to the PD patients and healthy controls (the data subjects)?
Which information regarding the automated decision-making must be provided to the data subject?
Why must meaningful information about the logic involved in automated decision-making be provided where the latter is not based solely on automated processing?
How to ensure human involvement in the decision?
Which elements characterize an algorithm as “understandable”?
